Projects will be assessed against four criteria – eligibility, feasibility, deliverability and affordability. Eligible projects will be assessed against a prioritisation matrix based on the above criteria.
Scoring system overview
| Sections 1 & 2: About your organisation |
|
|
| All sections must pass to move to Section 3 |
Pass/Fail |
|
| Section 3, 4 & 5 |
Max weighted score |
Pass mark to move to next section |
| Feasibility |
45 |
27 |
| Deliverability |
35 |
21 |
| Affordability |
20 |
12 |
| Total score |
100 |
60 |
| Section 6: Details and declaration |
Pass/Fail |
|
Sections 3,4, and 5 will be assessed drawing on the evidence you provide in relation to each of the questions asked. Each question will be given a score out of 5 as follows:
0 No evidence presented
1 Very little, weak or irrelevant evidence presented
2 Some evidence presented but lacks in either conviction or relevance
3 Clear, relevant answers with limited evidence
4 Clear, convincing answers with strong evidence
5 Strong, clear and relevant convincing evidence from a variety of sources (proportionate to scale)
Each question will be weighted to reflect its importance. This means the score is multiplied by the weighting number to give a weighted score.
Projects must achieve a minimum threshold score of 60 in order to be successful and will be ranked according to individual scores.
Successful projects must provide feedback to monitor progress, evaluate results, and capture learning and good practice. This may include attendance at council facilitated workshops and/or meetings.
Section 1 & 2: About your organisation
| |
Pass/Fail |
| Legal name of organisation |
Name is consistent with the governing document |
| Contact for the organisation |
Clear contact details for the organisation |
| Location for delivery |
Confirmation that funded service will be fully delivered within the Lisburn & Castlereagh City Council area |
| Date formed |
Date of constitution or incorporation on governing document is more than 12 months ago |
| Main purpose of group |
The description reflects the purposes set out in the governing documents |
| Bank account / signatories |
At least two unrelated people to authorise any payment or withdrawal |
| Policies |
All appropriate policies provided e.g. H&S, Safeguarding etc. as evidenced through supporting documentation |
If all passed, applications can move to section 3.
Section 3: Feasibility
| |
Evidence |
Weighting |
| Programme |
Clear outline of the programme/project with strong linkages to scheme objectives. Response clearly indicates anticipated outcomes |
3 |
| Identified needs |
Evidence of proportionate efforts to identify community needs demonstrate local needs |
2 |
| Impact of programme |
Clear explanation of how the programme will strengthen community resilience, alleviate financial pressure and promote resource sharing |
2 |
| Beneficiaries |
Detailed description of intended beneficiaries, including estimated numbers, demographics, and how they will benefit from the project |
2 |
Requires a minimum score of 27 to pass and move to the next section.
Section 4: Deliverability
| |
Evidence |
Weighting |
| Partnership and collaboration |
There is evidence of identifying key stakeholders, potential for collaborative working, share resources and consideration to reduce duplication of service |
2 |
| Response to local need |
There is evidence of the group’s response to local need to strengthen wellbeing and inclusion of residents |
4 |
| Monitoring and evaluation |
Clear plan for tracking progress, evaluating impact, and capturing learning. Includes indicators of success and commitment to reporting and adaptation |
1 |
Requires a minimum score of 21 to pass and move to the next section.
Section 5: Affordability
| |
Evidence |
Weighting |
| Funding needed |
The funding requested falls within the rules and parameters of the scheme.
The budget adds up, appears to cover key elements and is proportionate to the scale of work and the nature of the needs of users or participants |
3 |
| Value for money |
The funding requested offers value for money given the number of people engaged and the nature of the needs being met |
1 |
Requires a minimum score of 12 to pass and move to the next section.
Section 6: Declaration
| |
Pass/Fail |
| Acknowledgment agreement |
Accepted with signatures, below
|
| Declaration |
Signed by a member
|
Application will proceed to allocation if Section 6 is completed in full.